Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos: Artículo 19 - Todo individuo tiene derecho a la libertad de opinión y de expresión; este derecho incluye el de no ser molestado a causa de sus opiniones, el de investigar y recibir informaciones y opiniones, y el de difundirlas, sin limitación de fronteras, por cualquier medio de expresión - El final para los traidores a Dios verdadero está muy próximo, porque el mal es vencido siempre por el Padre eterno, padre infinito de amor, paz y bondad. Como dijo Jesús: el hombre solo será salvado por amor.Le ruego a nuestro amadísimo Dios, que tenga misericordia de los ignorantes y ciegos, pues ellos conducen este mundo de caos, horror y vileza. También le ruego, que deje que mentes inteligentes, sensibles y bondadosas tomen el relevo de esta realidad nuestra para liberarnos y evolucionar. También deberemos ser nosotros mismos los que nos ganemos los premios, el mayor de los premios es nuestra propia libertad, económica, social, mental y de tantas otras formas que no podemos disfrutar, cuando no comprendes que eres esclavo de los pensamientos de otro, unos pensamientos que heredaste al nacer y "NO" son tuyos.

jueves, 19 de diciembre de 2013

Desde la sombra (E57). El código alimentario y el pan nuestro de cada día



Publicado el 18/12/2013Mucha gente cree que puede comer lo que quiera, según su apetito y presupuesto. Pero nadie sabe con certeza qué contiene nuestra comida, si hay elementos tóxicos o dañinos para la salud. En este episodio, Daniel Estulin habla de cómo las burocracias gubernamentales, la OMC, el Codex Alimentarius y las multinacionales buscan controlar la calidad y el suministro mundial de alimentos y medicamentos. La humanidad es usada como rata de laboratorio, en un experimento masivo sin control ni norma.

TODOS LOS PROGRAMAS: http://actualidad.rt.com/programas

Vídeos Relacionados:

4 comentarios:

  1. It is the fallacy of the "scientifical comprobate " The FAO or FDA works with "scientific comprobate" facts. In reality these facts are total uncertatintly. They works with the Daily Tolerable Intake for substances but they do not consider the additive effect of a lot ob substances in the generation of cancer.. They are gainst the organic products and say" they are not better or not have advantages against the normal products" but they deffend the transgenic products saying: "They(the transgenic crops) are equivalent to the traditional crops. They do not say "we do not know the future collateralities that willl be appeared after their application(technopathogenology). An argentinian professor was fired because he publish a work "technoipathogenological aspects of the genetical engineering" In theis work he demosntrate the uncertaintly of the genetic modificated crops.He was the first doctor in agricultural sciences in the national research council in argentina an in his university. He have had enough knowledge to affirm his oppinion.-

    ResponderEliminar
  2. China refuses a lot of transgenic maize from USA.The argentinian Professor have had right when he say that the transgenic technology was not enough safe and the big buyers of grains did refuse it.The future is organic agricuture. The professor lost an opposition because he have sustained that the technopathogenological aspects must be considered in the post harvest of grains. Thei deffend a Thesis in the examination"Post harvest handling and final quality for the consumer: The need of an technopathogenological focuses. He was was fired.

    ResponderEliminar
  3. I is logic the true hot point of the scientific activity is the "collateral effects" that are consecuence of the technique. But the technologist need a "true" knowledge to have tools to do technics. If the "tools" are weak the technology will be weak too. It is the innovative view of Professor Eguiazu an the technopathogenology as a preventive science.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. I think to learn technopathogenology must be a subject in each University. The scientists do not consider that the method is not a magic method.The scientific method although it is relative safe have lacks. The scientists must learn the arly recognition of these lacks.Without a specific subject it is impossible. The human being must be the ultimate Guinea pig of the system.The sci9ence is linear.The linearity of the scientific knowledge is the cause of the big efficiency but is also the cause of the lacks in the knowledge. The paper is the end product of the scientific activity, but after that technology will be done. If the technologist do not have "safe" papers he or she may done "false" techniologies with a lot of collateral occulted effects.

    ResponderEliminar